On Apr 6, 2005 9:19 PM, John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > http://www.hf.uio.no/filosofi/njpl/vol1no2/revolution/revolution.pdf > > Oh, that Jaako! What a card! He is technically > right, of course, I can't figure out how: (1) AxEyAz(Eu/Ax) S(x,y,z,u) differs from: (2) EuAxEyAz S(x,y,z,u) They seem equivalent to me. Any hints? mu'o mi'e xorxes