[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Denoting counterfactual sentences in Lojban?
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 05:54:33PM -0400, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> Hopefully someone on this list can clear things up for me. I have
> one significant question -- how to represent hypothetical
> sentences
da'i, or put it in an abstraction; all abstractions are technically
non-veridical.
> First, consider Exercise 7, part 2:
>
> "Susan assumes that Zhang knows that Susan is late."
la .susan. sruma lo du'u la .zang. djuno lo du'u la .susan. lerci
> The translation given in the answer key is:
>
> .i la suzyn. sruma lenu la jan. djuno lenu lerci fa lenu la suzyn.
> klama
Whether to use nu or du'u is stylistic, for the most part, in this
case.
> Now, this is OK but personally I find it a bit annoying. I found
> myself wanting to do instead something like
>
> .i lenu la suzyn. klama cu lerci ("The event of Susan coming is late")
> .i la jan jimpe go'i ("Zhang knows the previous.")
> .i la suzyn. sruma lenu go'i ("Susan assumes the previous.")
>
> or else replacing the last of the three sentences with
You're certainly welcome to if you like. It seems obnoxiously
verbose to me, however.
> .i ra srumo lenu go'i (using "ra" to refer to "Susan", pretty
> obviously in context)
Use "sy" to refer to Susan.
> However, I don't yet know how to mark the second utterance in this
> chain as hypothetical, so that the listener knows I don't really
> believe Zhang knows the previous, I'm just saying that Susan
> assumes so. IN other words, I want to say
>
> .i la jan HYP jimpe go'i ("Zhang knows the previous.")
da'i
Alos pe'i, ti'a, .ia. Probably some others.
> I don't like
>
> .i la lojban HYP mintu le glibau
>
> because this is a posited equivalence between two entities of
> different types, it seems semantically incorrect even though it
> may (?) be syntactically allowable.
You mean because it equates a cmene and a lujvo? It doesn't matter;
they are both names, because of la. It's the referents that matter.
gliban, btw.
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/