[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: How many possible gismu?
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: [lojban] Re: How many possible gismu?
- From: "H. Felton" <fagricipni@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:19:45 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WHXMux1nDQmlw5DSeHUK8gAWmlVwHEfWLNQAclEGMvQ=; b=uz70bXyZgVg7VDo7Lool37vulVm1Ak/tu/baeqfuxAlk1nIaHsSOb2FJUlztbC9emc pEhzLBx6szlqFKjMPYRn56vB1QEOKTYJQIIs5KdSf/Sn9qFueGBmkEbQ4BUR3ipNHg10 WPI57op8BExQ6OlrzBVAC9jyeKWmGIbvGXY1c=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tW5x5M01A/lSjlxiYI9UOsgSIbQY/a6s7inVuxvfwo2Y/vRQhTfeaAi6ihj687tFFG U6aZdD1BpIN2u7GmBbSd41eeETNgu+e+npLfCCiZnFQunE0SbfA32mJcn/xSKF2VytxJ 4eXTviYeqaGVTvscAEpvoWqsaopXVbmuDasmc=
- In-reply-to: <cc0.5c19efd9.37c49c44@wmconnect.com>
- References: <cc0.5c19efd9.37c49c44@wmconnect.com>
- Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:45 PM, <MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com> wrote:
> My name "stevo" deliberately has the form of a gismu, but when I use it in
> Lojban, I always use "stevon". I never try to use "stevo" as a gismu. What
> would be its meaning? "x1 is the person called "stevo" "?
>
> mu'o mi'e stevon
As I remember the argument was that the person named "bunre" did not
actually have to be brown, perhaps they are named "Emmett Brown".
Since cmeme do not actually imply meaning, though they can suggest
meaning. (Even in English, most of the people who have a last of
"Smith" could trace it back to an actual ancestor who was an actual
smith.) Since, cmeme are not related to meaning, the expression
"la marca" can be unambiguously de-composed in to "la" followed by
a brivla, even if that brivla is meaningless, so as long as the
"la" is followed by a morphologically correct tanru, brivla, or
cmevla, the use of meaningless brivla (inculding meaningless gismu)
is not ambiguous, as long if it is morphologically correct; that what
I mean about "taking liberties with the morphology"; it's technically
legal, but pushing the boundaries of what was meant to be done.
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.