[lojban] Re: How many possible gismu?

[MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com]

In a message dated 8/24/2009 23:21:11 Eastern Daylight Time, fagricipni@gmail.com writes:


> Since, cmeme are not related to meaning, the _expression_
> "la marca" can be unambiguously de-composed in to "la" followed by
> a brivla, even if that brivla is meaningless, so as long as the
> "la" is followed by a morphologically correct tanru, brivla, or
> cmevla, the use of meaningless brivla (inculding meaningless gismu)
> is not ambiguous, as long if it is morphologically correct; that what
> I mean about "taking liberties with the morphology"; it's technically
> legal, but pushing the boundaries of what was meant to be done.


Since I don't want to push that particular boundary at the moment, I change "stevo" to the cmevla "stevon" in Lojban.  

stevo