Re: [lojban] [lojban-announcements] Essay on the future of Lojban, with a simple poll for the community.

[Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>]

Matt Arnold wrote:
> Our humble proposition is merely "more than zero change". Do not
> conflate that with "zero stability". There is a spectrum.

What, in the proposal, promises anything other than zero stability, or 
limits the amount or degree of change?

I see nothing that does either.

> The LLG is tasked with solving problems that Lojban *users*-- such as
> me-- often don't even realize exist.

byfy, I presume.

> I've studied Lojban for years,
> and the proposed changes I have heard are so obscure that I have never
> learned the things that I would have to un-learn.

That is because the existing policy was designed with that in mind.

Robin's proposal has backwards compatibility and un-learning at the 
bottom of the priority list, coming into play ONLY with all of the other 
three priorities indecisive.

lojbab

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.