Re: [lojban] {le} in xorlo

[Craig Daniel <craigbdaniel@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>
> "re lo ci bakni cu citka lo pipno" does not imply that both cows eat the same
> piano. Neither does "re lo ci bakni cu citka pa pipno" or (if I understand
> xorlo right) "lo pipno cu se citka re lo ci bakni". "pa pipno cu se citka re
> lo ci bakni", though, does imply that the same piano was eaten by both cows.

Wait, I thought the definition of SE conversions was such that "re lo
ci bakni ku pa pipno cu citka," "re lo ci bakni cu citka pa pipno,"
"pa pipno cu se citka re lo ci bakni," "te citka pa pipno ku re lo ci
bakni", and so forth were all equivalent. But my Lojban's a bit rusty
these days and my xorlo's never been entirely right; am I
misremembering?

 - mi'e .kreig.daniyl.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.