Re: [lojban] Comparison to Ilaksh?

[Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>]

And Rosta wrote:
> * Lojban aimed to be human-speakable and to acquire a speech community. 
> Ithkuil did not aim to be usable by humans in real-time. Ilaksh is less 
> phonetically daunting than Ithkuil, but still does not aim to be usable 
> by humans in real-time.

I guess this is something I'll never understand.  To me, if it isn't 
usable as a language, then it isn't a language.  It might be a 
language-related art project, as many artlangs seem to be, but I won't 
pretend to understand or appreciate art for its own sake.

To each, their own.

lojbab

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.