Re: [lojban] Named multiples

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se> wrote:
>> Anyway, I think your solution is great.  Do you see any problems with it?
>
> Maybe most obvious: {la .daniel. cu xagji} now requires a {cu}.

Yes, you would need a few more "cu"s here and there, but that's hardly
a big problem. And the main advantage (which is being able to form
tanru with a mix of cmevla and brivla) greatly offsets that minor
inconvenience in my opinion.

The real problem I see is that half(*) of the community would claim
that this amounts to pulling the rug from under their feet as they are
trying to learn the language, and all that stuff.

(*) Give or take some random number.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.