Re: [lojban] "noralujv" and camxes.

["komfo,amonan" <komfoamonan@gmail.com>]

2010/6/20 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>

On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> On Saturday 19 June 2010 14:58:58 Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>> camxes doesn't like "noralujv", but vlatai does.  Just wanted to
>> mention that so Pierre and xorxes could make sure that that
>> difference represents intention and not accident.
>
> This is known. Camxes does not accept words ending in two consonants. I think
> they are valid (as long as the consonants are a valid medial pair and
> everything else is OK) and cite the example of "ralj" from the Book. I
> ran "noraluj" and "noraluv" through camxes and it took them both.

Right, that's because ralj and lujv are not valid syllables.

I wonder which syllable of noralujv people stress when/if they ever
pronounce that word? I think I pronounce it "no,ra,LU,jv".

I always say "NO,ra,lujv". mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.