Re: [lojban] Connective question

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> You have never partaken of the orgasm-inducing desert known as the lemon
> bar?!  They are the best desert dish ever concocted by humanity.  Look at
> the pictures in this blog post and tell me honestly that you did not have an
> orgasmic reaction: http://adameyvtade.blogspot.com/2010/05/lemon-bars.html

I don't recall eating them under that name, but then I don't eat most
of what I eat under their English names. But they do look like the
base of Lemon Pie.

> And yes, I'm always getting jukpa and kukte confused for some reason.
>  Though I suppose seljukpa could have worked just as well.
> So, xorxes, your construction with {fa'u}... does that ultimately result in
> two sumti that are filling the same terbri?  Because that's really what I'm
> trying to get at.  Some way of externalizing a piece of a tanru so that it
> can be absorbed into two sumti (which are incidentally connected via .e).

As I said, the internals of tanru is not part of the machinery of
predicate logic, but if you are not too fastidious about that, then
yes.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.