Re: [lojban] Re: Cool

[Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>]

mmm, I like {.i'e} or variations to get more specific depending on what kind of "cool" one is talking about.

e.g.  {.i'e} for a generic "I like/approve of this",  {.i'e .u'e} for "that's awesome/amazing/etc...", {.i'e .io} for "that's awesome/amazing/etc..." but with the connotation that I myself respect it.

All of this being more evidence that I would really benefit from peppering my language with more UI (if I could get off my lazy ass and actually learn them all in completion)

On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:16 AM, Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Shouldn't there be an exclamation indicator? even at the
> observational? Just to be a little less unambiguous?
> Just asking.

You mean more unambiguous?

Either way, we have {ba'e} and {sai} and a bunch of other things.
I'm sure you could use those if you wanted.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.