Re: [lojban] Cool

[Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>]

Yes, my mistake.  I'm not sure why I thought {jit} was a rafsi for {jitro}.

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:

  Why not continue that with something like {xipnrtismu} or the like instead of making either some ungodly lujvo to explain what it is in modern day or some completely off the wall thing based off of what it originally meant?  e.g. (respectively) {menjitrvelmikce} or {cnosipna}.

 

   I assume you meant "menjitryvelmikce", since you were talking about lujvo, and no fu'ivla (in which case, mentrovelmikce is better)?

                   --gejyspa, being his usual nitpicky self.,

 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.