On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Bob LeChevalier, President and
Founder - LLG <
lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
> Theodore Reed wrote:
>>
>> 13:27 < treed> I'm past wanting to tinker with the language. I'd like to
>> just be able to use it and not have to worry that some asshat's going to
>> come along and dick with my shit.
ma fanta lo nu do ca'a go'i .i xu lo do kalci cu tai ruble ja'e lo nu
na kakne lo nu ri bandu ri lo nu gunta fa lo pinji
>> 13:28 < treed> If it weren't for outstanding broken bullshit, I'd just
>> suggest that we declare the time for tinkering over.
>> 13:29 < treed> And ignore the tinkerers henceforth.
do nau zifre lo nu toljundi lo tiknei .i do na nitcu lo nu lo drata cu
curmi .i .e'e ko zukte fi'o mapti lo se krici be do
> We did declare the time for tinkering over. Back in 1997 wen CLL came out.
> It became the current language baseline.
.i ku'i ui nai co'a la'e di'u do ji'i no roi pilno lo bangu
> I have been saying the above since then. xorlo was approved anyway.
.i .au do cusku bau lo jbobau .e nai lo glibau .i li'a no da jundi lo
se cusku be bau lo glibau zo'o
> Unfortunately, the tinkerers have a different concept of what constitutes
> "outstanding broken bullshit" than you and I do. Because we haven't gotten
> the BYFY project done, we can't redeclare the baseline, and the proposals
> keep coming.
da poi punji lo tutci lo jarco canko gi'e manci catlu ty gi'e no roi
pilno ty cu na se vajni lo du'u xu kau lo tutci cu xamgu banzu lo nu
pilno .i da poi ca'a pilno lo tutci cu djica lo nu cikre kei ca lo nu
da jinvi lo du'u ty na xamgu banzu
> We really have to finish defining the current language. Then decide if
> anything is broken enough to be worth fixing. Then fix it and be done.
ma'a noi vasru ba'e do cu nitcu lo nu pilno lo bangu .i ro drata cu
mleca la'e di'u lo ka vajni
> Then the tinkerers can be successfully ignored.
do djica u'i
mu'o mi'e xorxes