Re: [lojban] Questions on isolating utterances before completely parsing

[Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Krzysztof Sobolewski <jezuch@interia.pl> wrote:

Dnia sobota, 16 października 2010 o 08:02:11 Jonathan Jones napisał(a):

>  Still, as just a simple example of annoying practices (you call it amusing art, I call it annoying practice, agree to disagree, Stela), someone should post in .lokadin.'s evil no space writing style.
>
> .imiCUSkubaula.lojban. , to provide a rather simple example, although to truly do it justice, a more complex jufra should be used.

But but but - isn't it how you are suppoed to understand Lojban from hearing? A constant stream of phonemes, some stressed, some not? Does that mean that speaking Lojban is an annoying pratice? ;)
--
Ecce Jezuch
"In the darkest hole, you'd be well advised
Not to plan my funeral before the body dies" - J. Cantrell

That was lokadin's argument, IIRC. My answer is no, but writing conventions and speech are not the same thing.

-- 
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.