On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 02:14:43PM -0400, Luke Bergen wrote:
> So in this system "cu" becomes a generic shortcut for <insert all
> terminators that are applicable except for vau>?
>
> ... sounds cool if I'm understanding it correctly (probably not)
>
> On Oct 31, 2010 1:31 PM, "Robin Lee Powell" <
rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
> wrote:
> > Something that I and some others have talked about on IRC a few
> > times is "Wow, cu is pretty useful when deeply nested; wouldn't it
> > be nice to have something like that that could work in other places
> > besides before the selbri?".
> >
> > This turns out to be surprisingly tricky; many ideas have been shown
> > to be unworkable.
> >
> > I think I might finally have something: mark FA as needing
> > terminator closure before it. Example:
> >
> > mi denpa le nu do xruti fi le nu zutse
> >
> > vs.
> >
> > mi denpa le nu do xruti cu fi le nu zutse
> >
> > "cu fi" means "close terminators, at least one, until a fi is
> > allowed". More than one cu would be allowed there, with the obvious
> > effect.
> >
> > Please note that I am NOT attached to "cu" here; a postfix new cmavo
> > (i.e. "fi xu'u"), or whatever, would be fine. (IIRC postfix is
> > easier in terms of grammatical simplicity, but it's been a while).
> >
> > -Robin
> >
> > --
> >
http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
> > Lojban (
http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
> > is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
> > is "na nei". My personal page:
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "lojban" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
lojban@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to