Re: [lojban] bug in jbofi'e

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

  What Pierre is saying here is that jbofi'e treats "bjo" as if it
were a valid rafsi formulation, which it's not.  "bj" is not  valid
initial consonantal blend.  Therefore, jbofi'e should have simply
marked the whole word as a non-deconstructible  fu'ivla.

                       --gejyspa


On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:07 AM, .alyn.post.
<alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 10:36:10PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
>> I tried various permutations of "lojban". For "nalbjo" it says "being other
>> than ??", even though it says just "??" for "selbjo", and vlatai recognizes
>> both as fu'ivla.
>>
>
> I can't quite put together what you did here, what happened, and
> what you expected.
>
> Can you restate this as a transcript showing what you typed, the
> output you got, and what you expected the output to be?
>
> -Alan
> --
> .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.