Re: [lojban] bug in jbofi'e

[Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>]

On Friday 05 November 2010 12:36:16 Michael Turniansky wrote:
>   Right, because it's behaving as if "bjo" is a valid rafsi formation.
>  (For example, compare the way it handles "nalce'e/selce'e")  It knows
> that nal- means "other than f" where f is the gismu of the second
> rafsi, so it can say that part even if the second rafsi is undefined.
> But SE conversions it can't do unless the rafsi is actually pointing
> to  a real gismu because the x2 's gloss is completely
> gismu-dependent, so those just return "???".  (just like it can say
> "grace'e" is "weighed in grams -???").  What is SHOULD be saying is
> "unrecognized word", just like "grabjo" gets you.  It obviously has
> special code for certain beginnig rafsi.

"grabjo" gets "unrecognized word" because it's a slinku'i. "norbjo" 
and "narbjo" get "???" because they're fu'ivla. "tolbjo", however, 
gets "being opposite of ??", which is a bug. Why it tries to 
translate "tolbjo" and "nalbjo" as lujvo, but "norbjo" and "narbjo" 
and "valbjo" as fu'ivla, I don't know.

Pierre
-- 
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.