Re: [lojban] Lojban CFG Questions

[".alyn.post." <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org>]

On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 08:32:18AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 05:59:38AM -0500, Bob LeChevalier, President
> and Founder - LLG wrote:
> > 
> > I don't know the answer to your questions, but the guy who
> > developed the  elidable terminator formalization, 
> 
> It's not a formalization; that's the whole point here.  The yacc
> version "handles" them by erroring out and running some code to
> handle the errors.
> 

Do you know what camxes or jbofi'e do in this case?  Is it the same
behavior?

Why should we not formally define this behavior, introduce a
/syntax/ for it, and solve the problem from that direction?
What about the situation don't I understand that makes that
problematic?

-Alan
-- 
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.