Re: [lojban] *-no-SA-handling in PEG grammar

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:15:06AM -0700, .alyn.post. wrote:
> There are several productions of the form *-no-SA-handling,
> (BAI-no-SA-handling, BAhE-no-SA-handling, &c) in the Lojban PEG
> grammar.
> 
> I can't see that any of these productions are referenced by other
> productions in the grammar.  What are these rules?  It seems that
> removing them would have no effect on the parser.

These appear to be a side effect of how SA handling used to work;
diffs back to the version in question attached.  I've updated the
source to remove them.

> Similarly, I can't see that CMAVO-clause is referenced anywhere.

Commentend out, with a note-to-self.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.