Re: [lojban] zoi bug in camxes?

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 07:47:27PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> If the example had been for example "zoi gy gyrate gy", then yes
> it would break, because "gyrate" is three cmavo "gy ra te". That
> would be a better example for what CLL is saying there.

Huh.

zoi gy gyrate gy fails in camxes; that seems like a bug (in camxes)
to me.  It seems to me that the final zoi delimiter must have a
pause on both ends.  But I haven't read the relevant CLL bit in
quite some time; what does it say about that?

Certainly for 

  zoi gy. gyrations .gy.

to "work" but 

  zoi gy gyrate gy

to "not work" is a bug in camxes by my standards; it needs to be one
or the other.  xorxes is correct as to the *reason* it's like that,
but that doesn't, IMO, make it OK.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.