Re: [lojban] inconsistency between PEG grammar and CLL 17.4

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 06:25:24PM -0700, .alyn.post. wrote:
>>
>> -> su bu
>>    text
>>       buClauseNoPre
>>       |- CMAVO
>>       |     SU: su
>>       |- CMAVO
>>             BU: bu
>>
>> Now wait just a minute here.  The rule above *explicitily forbids*
>> SU.  How is it that it is matching?
>
> I *think* this is the only case you found where the PEG contradicts
> the Magic Words page.  Yep, that's a bug; I'd love it if you'd
> suggest a fix/patch.

And similarly for "su zei da", which shouldn't parse..

Why is "!ZEI-clause !BU-clause" needed in:

 post-clause <- spaces? si-clause? !ZEI-clause !BU-clause indicators*

I haven't checked very carefully, but the fix might be as easy as removing that.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.