Re: [lojban] confusion over FUhE-post PEG grammar rule

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:32 PM, .alyn.post.
<alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 07:14:03PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:05 PM, .alyn.post.
>
>> >  * the spaces? production will always match the empty string, as
>> >   FUhE-post only appears in FUhE-clause, and FUhE-pre, the rule
>> >   before it, ends with a spaces?
>>
>> This also applies to the spaces? in post-clause. If I'm not mistaken,
>> it never gets a chance to grab any spaces.
>
> Correct.  I have a patch out to camxes which fixes this, but I
> haven't push it to Robin yet.

My preference would be for spaces to be absorbed by the following word
instead of the preceding one (similarly to the way commas are absorbed
by the following letter rather than the preceding one).

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.