On 21 April 2011 10:01, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:One possible scenario is that each party create a sufficiently
> Let's say that, in lojbanistan, {ri'orcinki} refers to a particular species
> of insects, notable for their green color. Now, let's imagine the dyeing
> industry discovering that another insect, not particularly notable in
> appearance, effectively produces a green dye when properly treated. How
> would the dyeing industry contest the meaning of {ri'orcinki}, if it should
> so choose?
specific and distinct lujvo for their own use -- such as
{ri'orpilcinki} and {ri'opracinki} -- and then agree to expand the
meaning of {ri'orcinki} -- such as "an insect that has to do with
green color" -- so as to make it a hypernym to the new lujvos. If then
{ri'orcinki} was unserviceably generic and vague, it would naturally
fall out of use.
mu'o
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.