Re: [lojban] bu'a

[Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>]

I think bu'a/bu'e/bu'i would be much much much more useful if Lojban were a second order language, because then we could talk about the existence of predicates with desired properties in a non-stilted fashion. As a first order language, though, with second order mechanisms requiring stilted language, I don't think bu'a/bu'e/bu'i are especially useful.

 

mu'o mi'e latros

 

On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:01 PM, tijlan <jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:

What is your view on the bu'a series? Potentially useful? Totally
pointless? I've never used it myself, but I could be missing some
important aspect of Lojban as a logical language.

mu'o mi'e tijlan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.