Re: [lojban] xorlo and masses

[Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>]

On Saturday 13 August 2011 08:47:39 Martin Bays wrote:
> My point then was that the following three assertions are inconsistent:
>
> (i) {ro lo broda cu broda} is a tautology
> (ii) {ro loi broda cu broda} is a tautology
> (iii) loi broda == lo gunma be lo broda (i.e. have the same referents)

I say (ii) is not a tautology. For many broda it is true (mu'a ro loi blanu cu 
blanu), but for some it is false (mu'a ro loi grake be li pa cu grake li 
su'a).

.i ro loi djacu cu djacu xu?
.i ro loi bakni cu bakni xu?
.i ro loi xrabo cu xrabo xu?
.i ro loi klama cu klama xu?
.i ro loi pavyseljirna cu pavyseljirna xu?
.i ro loi nargile cu nargile xu?

mu'omi'e .pier.
-- 
gau do li'i co'e kei do

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.