[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] {jdika} and short rafsi



http://bit.ly/eXxBrM  .u'i zo'oru'e


On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Friday 19 August 2011 08:11:48 Remo Dentato wrote:
> I just noticed that {jdika} [x1 (experiencer) decreases/contracts/is
> reduced/diminished in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has no short
> rafsi while {zenba} [x1 (experiencer) increases/is
> incremented/augmented in property/quantity x2 by amount x3.] has both
> {-zen-} and {-ze'a-}.
>
> I thought that {-jia-} might be a good rafsi for {jdika}, is there any
> way to suggest the addition of a short rafsi?

"ia" does not occur in lujvo. It does occur in fu'ivla, cmevla, and cmavo.

Pierre
--
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.