Re: [lojban] Re: nelrai is an exception?

[Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>]

On Sunday 21 August 2011 05:28:21 Remo Dentato wrote:
> Sorry! I hit Return too early! :(
>
> Looking at jbovlaste I've seen that some of lujvo ending in rai
> (traji) have their x2 set as traji4. while other don't:
>
> brarai   $t_1=b_1$ is the biggest among set/range $t_4$
> property/dimension $b_2$ (ka).
> dibrai   $t_1=d_1$ is dearest/most precious to $d_2$ among set/range
> $x_3=t_4$. mlerai  $m_1=t_1$ is most beautiful among set/range $t_3$ to
> $m_2$ in aspect $m_3$ (ka) by aesthetic standard $m_4$.
> nelrai   $n_1$ is most fond of $n_2=t_1$ (object/state) from set
> $t_4$, due to extreme $t_3$ (ka, default ka zmadu).
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to standardize? I would prefer that x2 would
> consitenlly be traji4.

"nelrai" should be "n1=t1, out of t4, likes n2 most". The current definition 
of "nelrai" should be called "rairnei". See "neizma" and "zmanei". 
Possibly "raimle" and "rairdirba" should be defined analogously.

Pierre
-- 
Don't buy a French car in Holland. It may be a citroen.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.