Re: [lojban] Far away

[Stela Selckiku <selckiku@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Michael Turniansky
<mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>   I will go further.  Unless and until a new CLL is written, I will continue
> to use va/vi/vu for origin, and termsets for distance. So,
> nanny-nanny-boo-bo!
>              --gejyspa, believer in the wirtten "word from on high"

Avoiding the area until it's resolved is fine, but using two different
definitions isn't! :(  I've been using this for marking origins: {PU
ZI ca (origin)} and {FAhA VA bu'u (origin)}.  If I understand
correctly-- someone tell me if I'm wrong-- that will properly mark an
origin under *either* meaning of ZI/VA, won't it?  It only comes up a
few times a day, so I don't feel like an extra {ca} or {bu'u} is too
much of a price to pay to avoid making this area of the grammar a
newbie-confusing warzone.

mu'omi'e la stela selckiku

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.