Re: [lojban] lojban.org is broken

[Ian Johnson <blindbravado@gmail.com>]

The implication is the following:
lo ka bu'a cu rokci

Does that clear it up?

mu'o mi'e latros

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:45 AM, djandus <jandew@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, September 29, 2011 7:51:14 AM UTC-5, .alyn.post. wrote:

.i la camgusmis cu ckaji lo rokci

So, I'm confused. I thought that even though {ckaji} is defined to have a ka-based x₂ place, when using it you must say {lo ka}. Is that not the case, or is this just a special case of eliding {ka} when it's usage would be obvious? (something which I thought would be left to {tu'a}...)

mu'o mi'e djandus

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/sO5NJ1VPoCIJ.

To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.