Re: [lojban] {zo'e} as close-scope existentially quantified plural variable

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> Ah! Have {lo} *only* able to get kinds, you mean? That would indeed deal
> with my main issue with kinds+xorlo. But presumably xorxes wouldn't like it.

I don't have a problem with you always calling the referent of "lo
broda" a kind, if that helps. What's the difference between saying
that the referent of "lo mi xance" is a kind and not saying it?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.