[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Is dot side official-official?



In that case, I believe that the wording on the linked page is misleading (and incidentally, lojban.org is loading really slowly)

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:03:31AM -0400, .arpis. wrote:
> I was looking through the BPFK sections on the wiki, and looked
> here:
> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/Controversial+points+in+the+morphology
>
> It seems to imply that dot side has been officially accepted. Am I
> misunderstanding?

It depends how you define "official".  By most standards, it has
not, but it almost certainly will be some day.

-Robin

--
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.




--
mu'o mi'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.