* Saturday, 2011-11-05 at 11:19 -0400 - Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org>:
> ta'o nai, what about
> {pa xabju cu turni ro xabju}?
> Based on the berets example, it seems you would want to interpret this
> as "residents govern all residents", i.e. the same as for {ro xabju cu
> se turni lo xabju} above?
>
> Or perhaps you wouldn't, but only because we have {xabju} on both the
> left and the right, blocking a domain with only one xabju? If so, how
> about {pa na'e xabju cu turni ro xabju}?
In light of your reply to And of a few minutes ago, I see that
I shouldn't be using {pa} here.
So make that {su'o na'e xabju cu turni ro xabju} - by analogy with the
berets, you'd hae that meaning that one-or-more *kinds* of non-resident
rule all residents - being something we could have deduced from {ro
xabju cu se turni su'o na'e xabju}?
Attachment:
pgpiTEGPNGL9I.pgp
Description: PGP signature