On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
y. zo fa'u cu srana lo sumti .e nai zo mo
(forgive the falling back into English)
Respectively, I disagree. fa'u is a JOI, and as such, can connect either sumti or selbri. It is not limited to sumti as, say, termsets are. As such, it is perfectly valid to say "mi fa'u do cu xebni fa'u nelci la'o skin. Krull skin.", which devolves into two parallel assertions -> "mi xebni la'o skin. Krull skin." and "do nelci la'o skin. Krull skin." Or, "mi citka fa'u pinxe lo sparagusa ku fa'u lo djacu" (mi citka lo spragusa gi'e pinxe lo djacu) Or even: "mi morji fa'u tolmo'i ku'i lo du'u do pu nelci fa'u citka le cirla" (I remembered that liked the cheese but forgot that you ate it), although cutting into a sub-bridi like that might be a bit cheesy.
--gejyspa