* Wednesday, 2011-11-30 at 09:36 -0800 - Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>:
> AFAICT, *NONE* of the clothing words have a place for "being worn
> by...". See http://vlasisku.lojban.org/vlasisku/taxfu , wich seems
> to list all of them.
>
> {taxfu} has such a place, but it's ... umm, I'm not sure what that
> tense is called; intentional or something?, but it's a place for the
> sort of person that *could* wear the thing, not the person that
> actually *is* wearing it.
>
> This means the *only* way to talk about people wearing clothing is
> with {dasni}.
>
> WTF is the point of having place structures if I can't say {mi te
> pastu}?
Because then something would pastu only when it was being worn.
Attachment:
pgpx5OYTj8HBD.pgp
Description: PGP signature