Re: [lojban] Rant (baby related): dasni, taxfu, and all their friends.

[Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org> wrote:

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:36:47AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
> AFAICT, *NONE* of the clothing words have a place for "being worn
> by...".  See http://vlasisku.lojban.org/vlasisku/taxfu , wich seems
> to list all of them.
>
> {taxfu} has such a place, but it's ... umm, I'm not sure what that
> tense is called; intentional or something?, but it's a place for the
> sort of person that *could* wear the thing, not the person that
> actually *is* wearing it.

So I checked the place structure of dasni, and, hmm.

# x1 wears/is robed/garbed in x2 as a garment of type x3.

Would this mean that {mi dasni lo cutci lo mapku} means “I'm wearing a shoe on my head”? Maybe not.

  Yes, it would.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.