Re: [lojban] state of {binxo}

[Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>]

On Thursday 08 December 2011 16:29:43 Felipe Gonçalves Assis wrote:
> Not trying to amend {binxo}, just to clarify its implications.
>
> So, summing it up, the only thing I can generally assert about
> binxo1 and binxo2 is that either the first ceases to exist or the
> second comes to existence in the span of nu binxo, right?
>
> Even this is important, because it means that, no matter how I
> refer to or describe them, either binxo1 has no future or binxo2
> has no past.

I think that, in all cases, binxo2 has no past. To express having no future, 
I'd say "tolbi'o": la .alan. binxo lo barmisua gi'ecabo tolbi'o lo nanla.

mu'omi'e .pier.
-- 
I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.