Re: [lojban] semantic parser - tersmu-0.1rc1

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>
> Another side-issue (which I maybe shouldn't mention but will anyway) is
> what {PA plise} abbreviates. Is it short for {PA da poi plise} where
> {da} isn't already bound - which saves at least two syllables and saves
> us having to bind a new da? Or is it short for {PA lo plise} - which
> just saves one syllable? The usage here, lojbanic history and the
> demands of efficiency all point towards the former, but the gadri
> proposal currently states the latter.
>
> If that change is to be reverted, I think it would be best to do it
> sooner rather than later.

Done.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.