Re: [lojban] Update on gadri Proposal

[Felipe Gonçalves Assis <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>]

On 10 December 2011 05:44, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> So.... fix them? It's a wiki, pretty much anyone can make changes.
>

Sorry.
I know that I can, I just wasn't sure that I should make decisions
about the main
text of the proposal without notice.

Anyway, xorxes already did it, thanks.

> (At least, I assume the gadri proposal is located on the Lojban wiki, seeing
> as you didn't link to it and I'm not interested enough to go searching.)
>

http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+gadri

mu'o

>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Felipe Gonçalves Assis
> <felipeg.assis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Now that the formal definition of {PA broda} has been updated in the
>> gadri Proposal, there are other parts of it that need to be adjusted.
>> The first paragraph, defining {lo}, still says
>> "
>> When an outer quantifier is used without an inner quantifier, lo can be
>> omitted.
>> "
>>
>> I think this should be replaced by an exemplified explanation of the
>> differences
>> between {PA broda} and {PA lo broda}.
>>
>> Maybe some of the examples should be reviewed as well.
>> I find the parenthesised {lo} in the following particularly misleading.
>> "
>> o'i mu (lo) xagji sofybakni cu zvati le purdi
>> Caution! There are five hungry Soviet cows in the garden.
>> "
>>
>> mu'o
>> mi'e .asiz.
>>
>> 2011/12/9 Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
>> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Martin Bays <mbays@sdf.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Another side-issue (which I maybe shouldn't mention but will anyway) is
>> >> what {PA plise} abbreviates. Is it short for {PA da poi plise} where
>> >> {da} isn't already bound - which saves at least two syllables and saves
>> >> us having to bind a new da? Or is it short for {PA lo plise} - which
>> >> just saves one syllable? The usage here, lojbanic history and the
>> >> demands of efficiency all point towards the former, but the gadri
>> >> proposal currently states the latter.
>> >>
>> >> If that change is to be reverted, I think it would be best to do it
>> >> sooner rather than later.
>> >
>> > Done.
>> >
>> > mu'o mi'e xorxes
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "lojban" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "lojban" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.