[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Update on gadri Proposal
Well, it is often clear that lo broda is less than all the brodas we might
consider -- and often clear that it is at least all of them.
----- Original Message ----
From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, December 10, 2011 10:40:43 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Update on gadri Proposal
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 1:18 PM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
> {PA broda} picks PA brodas out of the whole universe of discourse; {PA lo
>broda}
> picks PA brodas out of lo broda. Of course, the two piles of available brodas
> may be the same, but they need not be and often are not. If the point of the
> example was to show that {lo} made no difference, then the example should be
> done away with indeed.
OK, I removed the offending sentence, and moved the offending example,
minus "(lo)", to the section on "le".
Since we have no way of specifying or determining the domain of
discourse, I think this is a distinction that makes no difference, but
it's not worth making a fuss over.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.