Re: [lojban] An opinion against Lojban/Loglan

[Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>]

It is sad you didn't pay attention to his post, there are a few valid remarks.

I especially retain this one :

natlangs are based on "linguistic predicates", Lojban on "logical
predicates".  Linguistic predicates come in more naturally and allow
more semantic flexibility.

2012/2/24, Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>:
> I stopped reading at:
>
>> I don't consider either Loglan or Lojban viable auxlangs.
>
> Neither do I, so I can't see how this could support any furhter argument.
>
> Anyway, I quickly browsed the rest.
>
> If I understood correctly, the author would have created a spin-off of
> Loglan in a different way and his way would have been much better than
> Lojban.
>
> The problem is that he didn't.
>
> I'll be very interested in his effort, I hope he will let us know when
> he has completed his equivlent of CLL so we can compare the two
> languages.
>
> remod
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.