Re: [lojban] LA SUMTI BRIVLA

[selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>]

*{la mi .crib.} does not work. However, it's perfectly fine to say {la 
pe mi .crib.} which *is* grammatical, just as {la noi banli [ku'o] 
.crib.} is also grammatical.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

Am 04.04.2012 15:11, schrieb Michael Turniansky:
>   Just checking with people who understand the grammar to make sure 
> that the following is correct:
>
> You are allowed to interpose a sumti between the la and name for those 
> cases where the name is a brivla, such as "la mi cribe cu gerku" -> 
> "la cribe pe mi cu gerku" (My Bear is a dog), or "la ba'u lo ponse be 
>  lo gerku kuku pinxe be lo djacu cu taske za'ure'u ku .oi" (The dog 
> owner's  "Water-Drinker" is thirsty again *sigh* )  but not where the 
> name is a cmevla, *la mi crib. cu gerku (*My Shreeb is a dog)
>
>   Would I have that right?  (The permissibility surprised me.  I can 
> readily see how the the latter can't be allowed, because it would 
> agglutinate into "la micrib. cu gerku", and how the first can't be 
> ambiguous, but I was surprised to see it was allowed anyhow, simply 
> because of symmetry reasons)
>
>                       --gejyspa
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

--
.i da xamgu ganse fi no na'ebo lo risna
.i lo vajrai cu nonselji'u lo kanla

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.