[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?

To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" <lojban@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:reply-to :subject:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=EtKXuBImtUXqJYHHakAefdw3cLCHH+nATFf6gI7xUTo=; b=6RBxCwQdyITYj5OqfRuEtrl78CiSQJRz+iGrZud8OfjVi9i7n0PtVYQYY2DZkrR62U gtwTK3Yu7hTyUHOQDOzIW/GmfdiAiNlB94tTeQTBX66VE3h4h68X/LLb5myf0QScZsj4 H3sc8MPmUzme8Gqfx6meeVN4vrAxNNEnqWNLI=
In-reply-to: <fd761f5a-0269-43b7-bd60-7fe8f827c497@googlegroups.com>
List-archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
List-help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-id: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
List-post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
References: <CAGO2uOPcMjNogyRO8Wi-v+swm60xLR8X21=aykzmcMOh51e0-g@mail.gmail.com> <fd761f5a-0269-43b7-bd60-7fe8f827c497@googlegroups.com>
Reply-to: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com

Presumably the oft-repeated one to take noisy signals into account in LoCCan 3 so that very different concepts don't have readily confused words (a problem across most cmavo categories, at least).

From: la .lindar. <lindarthebard@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:28 PM
Subject: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?

So, is not that something that is annoying ?

No.

It is quite annoying.

What is your point, though?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/KIe4XBEjVE8J.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>

References:
- [lojban] Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
- [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
  - From: "la .lindar." <lindarthebard@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
Previous by thread: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread