Personally, I'd much rather just change the accepted meaning of "it" from "gender-lacking third person" to "gender-unspecified third person".On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
Honestly, I don't particularly like "ey" much either, seeing as it's literally "they" with the "th" removed.On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:41 PM, la .lindar. <lindarthebard@gmail.com> wrote:
use ey's stuff.Use *eir* stuff.--To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Tq1_uOwTj3kJ.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )