On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:41 AM, gleki
<gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
Let's discuss it now ))).After reading the article I want new language even less.
The monkey took the banana and ate it.
Pam went home because she felt sick.
The dog ate the bird and it died. (!!!!!!!!!!!)
In each case I can use {ta} and the context will decide who felt sick (the house or Pam) and who died (the dog or the bird).
In other cases vo'a, ko'a can solve the problem.
{sei} can be problematic for me but I hope CLL 1.1 will explain it.
I can think of no other cases of anaphora.
And it's still am mystery for me what can be done with
2. There should be new cmavo for individuals, sets and masses
3. new design of connectives
Well, the connectives issue is, as far as I'm aware, that there's too many of them, and some are very poorly defined- we don't know exactly how they interact.
I believe .xorxes. created a proposal that addressed the first issue at least. I remember reading it, and deciding that I rather liked the idea. Let me see if I can find it, I know it's on the Lojban site.
On Monday, July 2, 2012 10:26:12 AM UTC+4, la .lindar. wrote:
It's come up a few times.
I think we're working on the rest.
It's a theoretical next-step language, but I don't see it happening any time soon since we're changing up our game.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/ZqkHTaoWCKAJ.