[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Not for wrong to lojban but to improving lojban



I'll agree that Lojban makes certain kinds of communication easier, but the intellectual capacity of an individual is not determined by language. Further, your reasoning is flawed for the simple reason that, there being no native speakers of Lojban- except Robin's twins, eventually- the mere fact that we were all raised in a different language than Lojban, and as such developed our relative intellectual prowess' in the environment of those languages, flies directly in the face of your statement.

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:44 AM, gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
Whatever la .ki'es.di'es. writes here he has made the right decision to join the Lojban community. pe'i no community in the world can be called intellectual elite as I can say it about Lojbanistan cuz the others use broken natural languages with their burden of broken semantics accumulated during their long historical development.


On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 2:14:51 PM UTC+4, buro...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
coi

some suggested ideas:

(1) writing from right to left, where positive bodies in the nature
revolove around itself from right to left, where positive is good and
negative is evil "something from philosophy".

(2) writing bridi lines from down to up of page, because from the
politeing behaviour that something transcends and does not fall
"something from philosophy".

(3) we can add to optimal dictionary which I suggested before a
literal meaning "not wrong".

and we should add "persons names" from other languages dictionaries.

(4) we can contain all posipilities, so we can contain all letters in
the existence where there is two versions of letter light and heavy I
suggest capital letter is heavy and small letter is light "e.g.
lojban X and french r where french r can writen in small letter x, and
lojban R and lojban r where R is like italian r and lojban r like
english r" and so on...

(5) I see not wrong if we use some special characters such as "? for
asking and ! for wondering and - between compound words and , for
quick stoping" "maybe add something to logical lojban connective".

co'o
ki'es-di'es

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/eL2CiRJMva8J.

To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.