On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:45 PM, la gleki
<gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, July 7, 2012 12:51:13 AM UTC+4, stevo wrote:
To return to the original question, I would like a new version of Loglan/Lojban that fixed the perceived problems associated with those two languages.
What are the problems perceived by you?
I would redo the entire vocabulary, eliminate rafsi or at least regularize the means for lujvo creation, simplify the grammar a lot. RPN, mentioned in a recent post, appeals to me. I like the simple grammar of Rick Morneau's Latejami.
Many of the issues of Lojban's faults are beyond me: scoping issues, variables, prenexes. I'd like it to be more like math notation.
I don't know what my solution would look like (well, I have a version, but it's only a relex of the gismu, so I don't normally count it).
And the sooner the better.
Who can do that if not those interested in loccan3? :)
I doubt anyone would do it if he wasn't interested in the result. And the defects of Lojban are best determined by fluent speakers. So until there is a community that can debate the issue in fluent Lojban, it probably shouldn't happen.
stevo