Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any demand for LoCCan3?

[MorphemeAddict <lytlesw@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:13:12 AM UTC+4, stevo wrote:

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

...

 

For the reasons given above, rafybri would be redundant in a well-designed loglan. Or, to put it a different way, a well designed loglan would use something akin to rafybri as its basic device. 

Better to stay in Loccan 2.0-2.9=Lojban then to move to Loccan >=3.0 

 

hunh? Maybe "stay"? 

.u'u

yes, "stay" 

I want LoCCan 10 or 100 or higher. 

I want it too. Do you have one?

Sadly, no. But the fastest way I know to get one is to produce and use as many versions as possible, figure out the benefits and flaws, and then create a new version based on that experience. "Good enough" isn't good enough. 

stevo

stevo 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/aaZILIPEY2oJ.

To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.