Re: [lojban] RE:Trivalent Logics

[John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>]

Yeah, with the unlikely exception of Aymara, it is hard to imagine what this would look like in practice.  Juggling even the six basics xorxes offers (or the minimal three) probably pushes one's understanding pretty far, unless you have a very concrete notion of what the third value is (and then you may be surprised at what the system offers you in some cases).  We seem to be better with fuzzy (but let's don't get started on that!) than clear-cut triads or more when it comes to dealing with the world.

---

From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 4, 2012 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] RE:Trivalent Logics

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Gleki Arxokuna
<gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
> doi xorxes xu do pu troci lo nu pilno lo cimei logji xusycmuma'o ca'o lo nu
> tavla?

.i no roi go'i

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.