1. Let usage decide
2. Lojban must be strictly regulated.
If future fluent speakers feel the need in separate words they will introduce them without breaking the design of the language.
On Friday, August 10, 2012 4:04:05 PM UTC+4, xorxes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Gleki Arxokuna
<gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In Lojban we have {zunle - pritu}, {bemro - snanu} etc.
[...]
> In other words only the current policy of Lojban is best.
It's not such a strict policy though. Many gismu that could have had
an obvious antonym don't have it: melbi, citno, cladu, jinga, cirko,
cinri, zdile, canci, cliva, claxu, cfari, and so on.
mu'o mi'e xorxes