[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] {.au}/{djica}={.ai}/{?}. No gismu for intention


On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> We don't have a good word for "intend", but assuming we can ignore the
>> problems of "platu", then "lo se platu be do ka'a na se djica" (or "na
>> bi'ai se djica").
>
> It should be {lo se platu be do ka'e naku se djica}, right?

"ka'e", yes, that was a typo. The "ku" is not needed.

Can I take "not needed" to mean "deliberately omitted in an attempt to flout the evil old NA-scope rule out of existence"?


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.